I have been informed that I'm not allowed to send your graded exam by email, sorry. Here are your updated scores and current estimated grade
Thursday, October 25, 2018
Sunday, October 21, 2018
just a little fact about polar coordinates
The radial coordinate is a distance from the origin. Since a distance can never be negative, when you're doing an integral in polar coordinates the lower limit of integration can NEVER be less than zero.
Wednesday, October 17, 2018
12.3 #10
Hi Dr. Taylor,
I can't see how this is wrong. I know that for polar graphs are integrated in terms of r*dr*dtheta (or r*dtheta*dr) and cartesian graphs are integrated in terms of dydx or dxdy. Am I missing something?
Thank you!
I can't see how this is wrong. I know that for polar graphs are integrated in terms of r*dr*dtheta (or r*dtheta*dr) and cartesian graphs are integrated in terms of dydx or dxdy. Am I missing something?
Thank you!
*********************************************
you left out the integrand f(x,y), respectively f(r cos(t), r sin(t))
Tuesday, October 16, 2018
12.3 #8
Hello,
Would you be able to help me understand why my bounds are wrong? I listed by bounds as a = 3pi/2, b = pi/2, c = 1, and d = 3 as integral set up from a to b, integral c to d (frdrdt).
Thank you,
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiU_V6y1mxawhXgA0mrqWa4WM5r2LTMoi4a6iVsGK3BOw4AqrkkAF7ODbaKgcxe2TCF6EkqmsCXJyqkCWR8E9MXUOwgsonHVM58cUbcBErL4HTvMAQAPjsTjaLsD09IULJxSx8dxStWTlo/s640/12.3%25238.png)
*******************************
Well, there are a couple ways you got tangled up. First of all, your outer limits of integration refer to the angular variable on the negative and positive y-axis while your inner variable is θ, so that you either need to have θ on the outside or make c,d refer to the angular variable. Second, you have a bigger than b. That means when you do an integral that you are doing integral backwards, so that integral would be over the opposite half washer--the one with the negative x-values. I recommend that you use -π/2 to π/2 instead.
Monday, October 15, 2018
Sunday, October 14, 2018
Friday, October 5, 2018
11.6#3
I can't figure out how to figure out this equation. What I did first was finding the gradient of the equation, I got gradient of f = <-2xy, -x^2, 3z^2>. Then I solved it at the point, I got gradient of f = <10, -1, 3>. Then I found the unit vector of v. <-3,3,4>/sqrt(34). Finally I dot product to find the directional deriv, which i got -21/sqrt(34). Please help, I don't know what I'm doing wrong.
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgMmCZBSrqux7tlQfAuw4vYVNtCvn_YAZ5miIUMc9L-EDGODxJNrg3Aj27WOyrA5q5ag6K9Di_443r4R5BTIWAZdgtsfM2i6j4b5wjykHSLtgu38cz9Aj2r-IzsK1-eVquLQQiimSIG6Z8/s400/11.6no3.png)
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgMmCZBSrqux7tlQfAuw4vYVNtCvn_YAZ5miIUMc9L-EDGODxJNrg3Aj27WOyrA5q5ag6K9Di_443r4R5BTIWAZdgtsfM2i6j4b5wjykHSLtgu38cz9Aj2r-IzsK1-eVquLQQiimSIG6Z8/s400/11.6no3.png)
*********************************
As you say: grad(f) = <-2xy, -x^2, 3z^2> .
This means grad(f) (5, -1, 1)=<-2(5)(-1), -(5^2), 3(1^2)> = <10, -25, 3> unlike what you say. It looks like you made the mistake of substituting -1 for x in x^2, but really you needed to substitute x=5 into -x^2.
Then since v=<-3,3,4>, v^ = <-3,3,4>/sqrt(34), as you say, so
D_v^ f(5, -1, 1)=<10, -25,3>.<-3,3,4>/sqrt(34) =(-30-75+12)/sqrt(34)=-93/sqrt(34)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)